<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for PolitiPorn™</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politiporn.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politiporn.com</link>
	<description>Serving Your Political Prurient Interests</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 07:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Love South African Style by Lodro</title>
		<link>http://politiporn.com/2009/03/31/love-south-african-style/#comment-1568</link>
		<dc:creator>Lodro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 07:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politiporn.com/?p=443#comment-1568</guid>
		<description>No, the South African government is missing something.

&quot;We in the South African government have not invited the Dalai Lama to visit South Africa, because it would not be in the interests of South Africa,&quot; he said. &quot;The attention of the world is on South Africa because of it being the host country for the 2010 World Cup, and we wouldn&#039;t want anything to distract from that.&quot;
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/mar/23/dalai-lama-south-africa-world-cup-ban</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, the South African government is missing something.</p>
<p>&#8220;We in the South African government have not invited the Dalai Lama to visit South Africa, because it would not be in the interests of South Africa,&#8221; he said. &#8220;The attention of the world is on South Africa because of it being the host country for the 2010 World Cup, and we wouldn&#8217;t want anything to distract from that.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/mar/23/dalai-lama-south-africa-world-cup-ban" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/mar/23/dalai-lama-south-africa-world-cup-ban</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Love South African Style by Hayden Tompkins</title>
		<link>http://politiporn.com/2009/03/31/love-south-african-style/#comment-1567</link>
		<dc:creator>Hayden Tompkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 05:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politiporn.com/?p=443#comment-1567</guid>
		<description>&quot;The official reason was that it would shift the focus away from the 2010 World Cup&quot;

Er.

Isn&#039;t that a soccer game?  

...

Am I missing something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The official reason was that it would shift the focus away from the 2010 World Cup&#8221;</p>
<p>Er.</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t that a soccer game?  </p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>Am I missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama the Great (And The End of a Man-Crush) by Lodro</title>
		<link>http://politiporn.com/2009/03/13/obama-the-great-and-the-end-of-a-man-crush/#comment-1565</link>
		<dc:creator>Lodro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 04:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politiporn.com/?p=439#comment-1565</guid>
		<description>Hayden - I agree. I guess I just had a hard time letting go. I wasn&#039;t trying to insinuate that everyone else was under his spell.

Marco - He&#039;s only going to use them when provisions of the legislation he is signing are unconstitutional. So don&#039;t worry. He will only violate the constitution when he is signing unconstitutional legislation into public law. 

Mssc - Obama is thinking about charging Vets for combat injuries? What a load of neocon bul... wait a second... Jesus Christ you&#039;re right. He is actually considering putting that into the budget! Does ths make sense to anyone? Absolutely deplorable. I&#039;ll ignore the silly part of your comment.

Joe Citizen - Just because you have a funny name doesn&#039;t mean you should be criticizing the two party system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hayden &#8211; I agree. I guess I just had a hard time letting go. I wasn&#8217;t trying to insinuate that everyone else was under his spell.</p>
<p>Marco &#8211; He&#8217;s only going to use them when provisions of the legislation he is signing are unconstitutional. So don&#8217;t worry. He will only violate the constitution when he is signing unconstitutional legislation into public law. </p>
<p>Mssc &#8211; Obama is thinking about charging Vets for combat injuries? What a load of neocon bul&#8230; wait a second&#8230; Jesus Christ you&#8217;re right. He is actually considering putting that into the budget! Does ths make sense to anyone? Absolutely deplorable. I&#8217;ll ignore the silly part of your comment.</p>
<p>Joe Citizen &#8211; Just because you have a funny name doesn&#8217;t mean you should be criticizing the two party system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
